HR 10674: National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026

HR 10674 in plain English: This bill would establish and operate National Institutes of Clean Energy, authorizing $400 billion over fiscal years 2027 through 2036 for that purpose. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Stated purpose

To establish a new federal agency within the Department of Energy, called the National Institutes of Clean Energy, that would invest in clean energy science, climate science, research, and innovation to reduce emissions and build climate resilience.

Key points

• Authorizes $400 billion from fiscal years 2027 through 2036 to establish and operate National Institutes of Clean Energy
• Modeled on a national institute structure to support clean energy research and development

Arguments supporters make

• Creating a dedicated federal agency for clean energy research, modeled on the success of institutions like the NIH, would provide sustained, focused funding that scattered existing programs cannot match.
• Prioritizing underrepresented research areas like long-duration grid storage and hard-to-decarbonize sectors could unlock breakthroughs that move the U.S. closer to energy independence and lower emissions.
• Directing research benefits and jobs toward disadvantaged and minority communities corrects a historical pattern in which those communities bore pollution burdens without sharing in economic gains.

Arguments opponents make

• Creating an entirely new federal agency adds bureaucratic overhead and duplicates missions already held by existing Department of Energy offices, potentially wasting taxpayer money on administration rather than research.
• The bill's definition of eligible technologies and communities is written with specific political priorities built in, which critics say could steer funding based on ideology rather than scientific merit.
• Concentrating research grants at preferred institution types and communities, rather than awarding them purely on scientific quality, could reduce the overall effectiveness of the federal research investment.

Tradeoffs

Directing funding and research priorities toward specific communities and institution types may advance equity goals but could reduce the open competition that some argue produces the highest-quality science. Standing up a new agency provides dedicated focus but adds cost and complexity compared to funding clean energy research through existing structures.

Current status in Congress: In committee.

NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week