HR 7757: KIDS Act

HR 7757 in plain English: The KIDS Act requires online platforms to implement specific protections for minors, including blocking access to harmful sexual content, adding parental controls on social media and video games, and requiring AI chatbots to identify themselves as non-human to minor users. The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general would enforce these requirements.

Stated purpose

The KIDS Act aims to protect children and teenagers online by requiring digital platforms to put safeguards in place for minors, give parents tools to manage their children's online activity, and make AI chatbots disclose their non-human nature to young users.

Key points

• Platforms where more than one-third of content is sexual material must use technology to identify and block minors from accessing it
• Social media platforms must set default limits on compulsive usage features and restrict other users from contacting minors
• Parents must be given tools to manage minors' privacy settings and restrict purchases on video game platforms
• AI chatbots must tell minor users they are not human and must display suicide and crisis intervention hotline information
• The FTC and state attorneys general would enforce all requirements

Arguments supporters make

• Children are exposed to harmful content and addictive design features online, and this bill gives parents real tools to protect them rather than leaving families to navigate dangerous platforms alone.
• Requiring AI chatbots to tell minors they are not human and to share crisis hotline information could prevent real psychological harm at a vulnerable time in young people's lives.
• Platforms have had years to self-regulate and have not done enough, so a federal law with FTC enforcement creates clear, consistent rules across the country instead of a patchwork of state laws.

Arguments opponents make

• Age-verification systems require platforms to collect more sensitive personal data from users, which could create new privacy risks and security vulnerabilities for the very children the bill aims to protect.
• Some critics argue the bill's content restrictions and design-feature limits could raise First Amendment concerns by giving the government broad power over what speech and features are available online.
• Compliance costs could fall hardest on smaller platforms and new competitors while large, established companies have the resources to adapt, potentially reducing competition and locking in today's dominant players.

Tradeoffs

Stronger protections for minors online require platforms to verify users' ages and collect more data, creating a tension between child safety and user privacy. The bill also sets federal rules that override some state laws, trading local flexibility for national consistency.

Current status in Congress: Passed House.

NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week