HR 881: DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act

HR 881 in plain English: This bill bars U.S. colleges and universities from receiving Department of Homeland Security funding if they maintain relationships—such as contracts, agreements, or in-kind donations—with Confucius Institutes, China's Thousand Talents Program, or Chinese universities linked to China's military, police, or intelligence activities. Schools can regain eligibility for DHS funds by ending those relationships.

Stated purpose

This bill aims to restrict Department of Homeland Security funding to U.S. colleges and universities that maintain relationships with Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, or Chinese entities of concern, as defined in the bill.

Key points

• Prohibits DHS funding to colleges that have contracts, agreements, or gifts from Confucius Institutes or related Chinese programs
• Defines Confucius Institutes as cultural institutes funded by the Chinese government
• Defines Thousand Talents Program as tech or education programs run by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
• Covers Chinese universities involved in China's military, police, or intelligence activities
• Schools can restore DHS funding eligibility by terminating the flagged relationship

Arguments supporters make

• Confucius Institutes and similar programs have been linked to concerns about Chinese government influence, intellectual property theft, and espionage on U.S. campuses, and cutting funding ties helps protect national security.
• Requiring universities to choose between DHS dollars and these relationships gives schools a clear, concrete incentive to close a potential backdoor for foreign interference in sensitive research.
• A waiver process is included, so universities with genuinely safe and beneficial relationships can still seek an exemption, making the bill targeted rather than a blanket ban.

Arguments opponents make

• Cutting off DHS funds based on broad definitions — such as any affiliation with the Chinese Academy of Sciences — could sweep in legitimate academic partnerships and hurt scientific research and international exchange.
• Universities, not the federal government, are traditionally responsible for managing their own academic relationships; this bill shifts that control and may set a precedent for broader federal interference in campus decisions.
• The bill's definitions of 'Chinese entity of concern' are wide enough that even indirect or minor ties could trigger full funding loss, which may be a disproportionate penalty that harms students and faculty who depend on those funds.

Tradeoffs

The bill trades some degree of international academic openness and university autonomy for a stricter federal check on foreign influence; institutions that benefit from both DHS funding and Chinese academic partnerships would be forced to choose one or the other.

Current status in Congress: Passed House.

NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week