S 390: BADGES for Native Communities Act
S 390 in plain English: The BADGES for Native Communities Act revises federal policies on information sharing, reporting, and investigating cases of missing, unidentified, or murdered Native Americans. It requires the Department of Justice to create a grant program and improve training and mental health resources for tribal law enforcement, while the Department of the Interior would launch a five-year demonstration program to improve background investigations for Bureau of Indian Affairs law enforcement hiring.
Stated purpose
This bill aims to improve how federal agencies share information, report cases, and investigate situations involving missing, unidentified, or murdered Native Americans, and to strengthen law enforcement resources and safety for Native communities.
Key points
- Provides $1,000,000 per year from 2026 through 2030 for a DOJ grant program to improve tribal missing persons and death investigation responses
- Requires DOJ and HHS to make federal training and culturally appropriate mental health programs available to tribal and BIA law enforcement officers
- Establishes a five-year DOI demonstration program to improve background investigations for BIA law enforcement applicants
- Directs the Government Accountability Office to study evidence collection, handling, response times, and processing by federal law enforcement agencies
Arguments supporters make
- Missing and murdered Indigenous people have long been undercounted and under-investigated, and this bill directly targets the data gaps and coordination failures that have left Native families without answers.
- Providing grants and training to tribal law enforcement helps communities protect themselves more effectively, respecting tribal sovereignty while adding federal support.
- Requiring government accountability studies and standardized reporting creates transparency and pushes agencies to improve practices that have historically failed Native communities.
Arguments opponents make
- Adding more reporting requirements, grant programs, and studies does not guarantee faster or better investigations on the ground, and could result in bureaucratic activity without meaningful safety improvements.
- A five-year demonstration program for background checks and various studies may delay real action, with critics arguing that concrete resources and jurisdiction reforms are more urgently needed than additional research.
- Federal programs designed for Native communities have historically been underfunded or poorly implemented, raising doubts about whether this bill's provisions will receive the sustained resources needed to make a lasting difference.
Tradeoffs
The bill invests in data sharing, grants, and studies that could take years to produce results, trading immediate resource deployment for longer-term systemic reforms. It also relies on federal agency coordination, which may help standardize responses but could reduce the speed and flexibility that individual tribes or local agencies might prefer.
Current status in Congress: Passed Senate.
NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week