Todd Blanche's Attorney General Nomination Stalls Over $1.8 Billion IRS Settlement Dispute

Trump's pick for attorney general, Todd Blanche, faces a stalled Senate confirmation as Republican senators demand written assurances about a controversial $1.8 billion IRS settlement.

Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer and current acting attorney general nominee, saw his Senate confirmation vote postponed after at least one Republican senator refused to back him without written guarantees about a disputed $1.8 billion IRS settlement fund. Senator John Cornyn of Texas said he would not support the nomination unless he received written confirmation that the settlement — which critics have called a 'slush fund' — is dead. The Senate Judiciary Committee delayed its scheduled vote, with a spokesperson saying 'work continues to secure sufficient support' for the nomination. Rather than distancing himself from the settlement, Trump publicly defended the $1.8 billion fund and called for Blanche to be 'immediately approved' as attorney general. Trump also attacked Cornyn publicly, accusing the senator of having no objection to the IRS settlement until Trump declined to endorse him in a Texas primary. Trump additionally said he might 'temporarily' drop the bid to make Blanche attorney general, signaling uncertainty about the nomination's future. Republican senators had sought written limits on the settlement, but Trump reportedly held firm, creating a standoff that put the confirmation at risk. Separately, the Justice Department under Blanche handed over unredacted Epstein-related records to a federal judge — a development that drew legal commentary. Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner argued that if those documents were altered before submission, Blanche could face obstruction of justice charges, and that a presidential pardon would not fully shield Blanche if evidence emerged of a conspiracy between Blanche and Trump to conceal information. No charges have been filed against Blanche, and the Epstein files angle was raised by commentators rather than federal investigators. The confirmation standoff remains a concrete and immediate obstacle, underscoring the narrow margins Trump faces in securing Senate approval even from within his own party.

Why it matters

Blanche's confirmation as the nation's top law enforcement officer requires Republican unity in a closely divided Senate, and the standoff reveals fault lines within the party over executive power and financial oversight. The outcome will determine who leads the Justice Department during a consequential period for federal law enforcement.

What's next

Senators and the White House are continuing negotiations to secure enough Republican votes for Blanche's confirmation, with Trump signaling he may temporarily withdraw the nomination if a deal cannot be reached.

Key facts

Bias & framing notes

The Raw Story source focuses almost entirely on speculative legal jeopardy for Blanche related to the Epstein files, amplified through commentary by a partisan legal pundit — this angle is not corroborated by the Guardian's reporting and represents opinion framing rather than established fact. The Guardian's multiple articles focus on the Senate confirmation standoff as the primary news event, which is more grounded in concrete actions and statements. The Epstein-pardon framing in Source 1 is speculative and should be weighted accordingly.

NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week