Defense AI Startup Smack Technologies Raises $61M Series B for Military Tools

Smack Technologies closed a $61M Series B to accelerate AI decision-making tools and wearable hardware built for battlefield use.

Smack Technologies has raised $61 million in a Series B round — its second funding round of 2026 — as the Pentagon's push to accelerate AI adoption drives investment into defense-technology startups. The Washington-based company builds artificial intelligence decision-making tools designed for military use, and plans to use the new capital to speed production of its flagship product. Alongside its software offerings, Smack is developing wearable AI hardware intended for battlefield deployment, expanding its product line beyond decision-support software into physical devices soldiers could use in the field. The funding round reflects a broader trend of venture capital following Pentagon urgency: as the U.S. military moves to integrate AI more quickly into its operations, startups positioned at that intersection are attracting significant investment. Smack's CEO has cited Pentagon pressure to move faster as a direct driver of the company's fundraising timing.

Why it matters

The round signals growing private investment in battlefield AI as the Pentagon accelerates efforts to integrate artificial intelligence into military decision-making and equipment. The development of wearable AI hardware for soldiers marks a step beyond software-only defense tools into physical, field-deployed technology.

What's next

Watch for details on when Smack's flagship AI decision-making tool and wearable battlefield hardware reach production milestones.

Key facts

• Smack Technologies raised $61 million in a Series B round
• This is Smack's second funding round in 2026
• The company builds AI decision-making tools specifically for military use
• Smack is also developing wearable AI hardware designed for battlefield use
• The CEO cited Pentagon pressure to move AI faster as a driver of the funding round
• The company is based in Washington

Bias & framing notes

Both sources draw from the same Reuters wire report, limiting independent corroboration. The NextWeb framed the story with a more editorial angle — describing Pentagon urgency as a 'business model' — while The Star presented the CEO's stated rationale more neutrally. Neither source provided financial details beyond the round size or named investors.

NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week