Judge Denies Trump's Bid to Delay $5.8M Payout to E. Jean Carroll
The Supreme Court refused to hear Trump's appeal of the $5M Carroll verdict, so she's now asking a judge to compel payment.
A federal jury in 2023 found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing former magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll and subsequently defaming her, awarding her $5 million in damages. The verdict stemmed from Carroll's account of being sexually abused by Trump in a New York department store dressing room in the mid-1990s, and statements Trump made publicly denying her account — which the jury found to be defamatory. Trump appealed the verdict, but the US Supreme Court declined to hear his case, exhausting that avenue of challenge and leaving the judgment intact. With the total amount grown to over $5.8 million with accumulated interest, Carroll asked the trial judge to issue a formal order requiring Trump to pay. Trump's lawyers filed a request to delay the payout, but the judge has now denied that bid, meaning Trump must satisfy the judgment. Trump has consistently denied Carroll's allegations.
Why it matters
The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the appeal effectively finalizes Trump's legal liability in the case, and Carroll's enforcement motion could result in a court-ordered mechanism to collect the $5 million judgment.
What's next
The trial judge must now decide whether to issue the payment order Carroll is requesting.
Key facts
- A jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a civil trial in 2023
- Carroll was awarded $5 million in damages
- The US Supreme Court rejected Trump's bid to appeal the verdict
- Carroll has asked the trial judge to order Trump to pay the $5 million
- The alleged sexual abuse occurred in a New York department store dressing room in the mid-1990s
- Trump has denied Carroll's allegations throughout the legal proceedings
Bias & framing notes
Both sources are from The Guardian and are consistent in their factual reporting. Because only one outlet is represented, independent corroboration is absent, which limits the trust score. Neither article appears to editorialize heavily, though framing Carroll as someone owed money she must now compel payment of implicitly highlights Trump's non-compliance.
NewsClear — neutral news & congressional tracking · Bill of the Week